Criteria
Other langugages:
ALB || SRB ||
ROM ||
TUR
Selection criteria
The Selection Committee will apply the following five criteria
in comparing and assessing the ideas submitted to the challenge.
Criterion 1: THE IMPACT OF THE IDEA IN ADDRESSING CLIMATE
CHANGE AND INCREASING URBAN RESILIENCE
This criteria assesses the contribution of the proposal to
achieving environmental objectives, as well as economic and
social objectives, through mitigation, adaptation or
resilience processes to increase urban resilience to climate
change.
Each idea will be assessed in all areas, particularly the
financial, organizational, institutional, technical and
technological aspects of the proposed product or service.
Projects that promote a transformation or transition in
practices, in everyday behaviour, occupations, approaches, and
tools, and which open up a new path for sustainable urban
development, will also be considered innovative.
Criterion 2: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE IMPACT
The quantitative impact refers to the number of people the idea
affects, the amount of monetary income it generates, the amount
of social and environmental capital it creates, and/or other
co-benefits.
The qualitative impact of a project refers to the extent to
which it advances social inclusiveness and accessibility, its
contribution to poverty reduction, and/or its contribution to
reducing gender-related inequalities. This requires a clear
description when the project is submitted.
Criterion 3: FEASIBILITY AND VIABILITY
This concerns the state of a project, its deployment process,
its financial balances, its institutional and legal
organization, and the sustainability of its social, human and
environmental benefits.
Criterion 4: REPLICATION
This refers to a project’s potential for replication,
dissemination and massification. It will therefore be necessary
for submissions to describe the modalities envisaged and any
partnerships that have been concluded or are expected.
Criterion 5: UTILITY AND OVERALL COHERENCE
Candidates must be able to demonstrate in what ways their
proposal provides a practical and tangible solution to one or
more clearly identified impacts of climate change.
- Environmental effectiveness
- Economic effectiveness
- Feasibility (measure easiness of implementation)
-
Measurability (measurability and verifiability of the measure
emissions reductions)
-
Co-benefits (health benefits, diversification of income, new
jobs, life quality, economic growth potential)